The U.S. burn care centers market was valued at USD 6 billion in 2021 and it is predicted to surpass around USD 10.4 billion by 2030 with a CAGR of 6.3% from 2022 to 2030.
The rising number of burn-related injuries is aiding the market growth. As per the data of the WHO, annually, about 500,000 patients were treated under emergency services in the U.S. The increasing number of treatment centers and facilities in the country owing to the increasing preference of patients for more personalized care and value-based services as compared to the general health services is bolstering the growth. Moreover, the introduction of advanced treatment options such as skin graft, wound debridement, and reconstructive surgery is expected to increase industry growth in the forecast years.
Growing awareness initiatives by government organizations such as the WHO and nonprofit organizations are also expected to fuel market growth in the coming future. These initiatives result in an increase in the number of injured patients seeking treatment from either in-hospital care units or standalone units owing to the increased awareness about injuries and commercial availability of effective treatments. This is expected to fuel the growth in the U.S.
Long in-hospital stays, multiple operating procedures, along with the requirements of expensive equipment make it a cost-intensive area. In addition, the growing demand for hygienic infection control areas for any burn care unit makes them quite expensive, which negatively affects market growth.
Scope of The Report
Report Coverage | Details |
Market Size in 2021 | USD 6 billion |
Revenue Forecast by 2030 | USD 10.4 billion |
Growth rate from 2022 to 2030 | CAGR of 6.3% |
Base Year | 2021 |
Forecast Period | 2022 to 2030 |
Segmentation | Facility type, procedure type, burn severity, service type |
Companies Covered | Saint Francis Memorial Hospital Bothin Burn Center; LAC+USC Medical Burn Center; Weill Cornell Medicine William Randolph Hearst Burn Center; Temple University Hospital Adult Burn Center; Parkland Memorial Hospital Regional Burn Center; MedStar Washington Hospital Center; St. Barnabas Burn Center; UMC Lions Burn Center; University of Chicago Burn Center; Ohio State University Hospital Adult Burn Center; University of Miami Jackson Memorial Hospital Burn Center; Brigham and Women's Hospital Burn Center Adult Burn Center |
Facility Type Insights
In 2021, the standalone segment held the largest revenue share of over 55.0% and is also expected to register the fastest growth rate over the forecast period. The growth can be attributed to the increasing number of patients preferring personalized care and value-based services over quantity-oriented offerings. Another reason driving the segment is the presence of a higher number of beds in freestanding facilities for long-term care of victims compared to in-hospital care. Furthermore, standalone units have specialty doctors and nurses who provide superior quality of care, which results in fewer infections. Thus, the majority of patients prefer to seek treatment from these facilities.
There is a rise in the availability of intensive care units in standalone facilities to manage long-term care for victims unlike in hospitals, where emergency admissions pose a challenge for hospitals as they lack in managing long-term stays. This is expected to increase the adoption of specialized care treatment provided by standalone facilities and over-generalized care offered by hospitals. Moreover, the introduction of advanced burn treatment options such as skin graft, wound debridement, and reconstructive surgery is expected to increase market growth in the forecast years. Product innovation, partnerships of standalone units with local healthcare providers to enter the U.S. market, and mergers & acquisitions are some of the strategies that further push the market growth.
Treatment Type Insights
In 2021, wound debridement emerged as the largest segment with a revenue share of over 30.0%. Various wound debridement procedures such as autolysis, enzymatic, mechanical, and surgical are performed in the burn care centers for the majority of the patients. Surgical debridement is the most performed procedure as this procedure is rapid and is applicable to many types of burn wounds.
Increasing adoption of these procedures owing to various associated benefits such as preventing infection and promoting healing among patients is driving its adoption. Moreover, the introduction of new debridement technologies, such as ultrasound debridement therapy, hydro surgery, monofilament polyester fiber pad debridement, and fluid jet technology, is positively contributing to the growth.
The skin graft segment is expected to witness the fastest growth over the forecast period. Increasing incidence of burns owing to various factors such as increased exposure to fire, overcrowding, lack of proper safety measures, and lack of supervision of children is boosting the adoption of skin grafting procedures for quality treatment and enhanced patient management. The skin grafting procedure involves the removal of healthy skin from one area and its transplantation on the other.
Burn Severity Insights
In 2021, partial-thickness burns held the largest revenue share of over 65.0%. It is also known as second-degree burns and involves the epidermis layer of the skin. These types of injuries are usually caused by chemicals, flames, scald injuries, sunburn, and electricity. The treatment of partial-thickness burns generates the most income in the treatment facilities and care units in the U.S. Depending on the severity of the injury, the treatment management plan including long-term observation care as well as other care services are decided.
The partial-thickness wounds treatment market is growing at a fast pace over the past few years owing to the increase in the number of hospitalized patients each year on the account of partial burns. Thus, the increasing prevalence of injuries in pediatrics and adults is expected to fuel growth in the market.
Full-thickness burn is expected to register the fastest CAGR over the forecast period. In full-thickness burns, all the layers of the skin are destroyed and may even penetrate the layer of fat below the skin. They are majorly caused by various external factors including radiation, chemicals, respiratory, electricity, and thermal causes. Skin grafts are majorly used for the treatment of such cases as they support fast healing of the wound.
Service Type Insights
In 2021, the inpatient service type emerged as the largest segment with a revenue share of over 80.0% due to a rise in the percentage of hospital admissions for victims. The segment is also expected to be the fastest-growing segment over the forecast period. The high costs associated with inpatient services are resulting in the growth of the segment as the number of hospital admissions and ED visits are witnessing a declining trend.
As per the statistics of the American Burn Association, every year, almost 450,000 burn injuries occur in the U.S. Economic support and investments for setting up advanced specialty burn care centers are likely to impel the market growth. Favorable reimbursement policies for treatment procedures performed in the in-house and standalone units in the U.S. are expected to foster the market growth.
Key Players
Market Segmentation
Chapter 1. Introduction
1.1. Research Objective
1.2. Scope of the Study
1.3. Definition
Chapter 2. Research Methodology
2.1. Research Approach
2.2. Data Sources
2.3. Assumptions & Limitations
Chapter 3. Executive Summary
3.1. Market Snapshot
Chapter 4. Market Variables and Scope
4.1. Introduction
4.2. Market Classification and Scope
4.3. Industry Value Chain Analysis
4.3.1. Raw Material Procurement Analysis
4.3.2. Sales and Distribution Channel Analysis
4.3.3. Downstream Buyer Analysis
Chapter 5. COVID 19 Impact on U.S. Burn Care Centers Market
5.1. COVID-19 Landscape: U.S. Burn Care Centers Industry Impact
5.2. COVID 19 - Impact Assessment for the Industry
5.3. COVID 19 Impact: Global Major Government Policy
5.4. Market Trends and Opportunities in the COVID-19 Landscape
Chapter 6. Market Dynamics Analysis and Trends
6.1. Market Dynamics
6.1.1. Market Drivers
6.1.2. Market Restraints
6.1.3. Market Opportunities
6.2. Porter’s Five Forces Analysis
6.2.1. Bargaining power of suppliers
6.2.2. Bargaining power of buyers
6.2.3. Threat of substitute
6.2.4. Threat of new entrants
6.2.5. Degree of competition
Chapter 7. Competitive Landscape
7.1.1. Company Market Share/Positioning Analysis
7.1.2. Key Strategies Adopted by Players
7.1.3. Vendor Landscape
7.1.3.1. List of Suppliers
7.1.3.2. List of Buyers
Chapter 8. Global U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, By Facility Type
8.1. U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, by Facility Type, 2022-2030
8.1.1. In-hospital
8.1.1.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
8.1.2. Standalone
8.1.2.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
Chapter 9. Global U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, By Procedure Type
9.1. U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, by Procedure Type e, 2022-2030
9.1.1. Wound Debridement
9.1.1.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
9.1.2. Skin Graft
9.1.2.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
9.1.3. Wound Management
9.1.3.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
9.1.4. Respiratory Intubation & Ventilation
9.1.4.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
9.1.5. Blood Transfusion
9.1.5.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
9.1.6. Pain Management
9.1.6.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
9.1.7. Infection Control
9.1.7.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
9.1.8. Rehabilitation
9.1.8.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
Chapter 10. Global U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, By Burn Severity
10.1. U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, by Burn Severity, 2022-2030
10.1.1. Minor Burns
10.1.1.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
10.1.2. Partial Thickness Burns
10.1.2.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
10.1.3. Full Thickness Burns
10.1.3.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
Chapter 11. Global U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, By Service Type
11.1. U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, by Service Type, 2022-2030
11.1.1. Inpatient
11.1.1.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
11.1.2. Outpatient
11.1.2.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
11.1.3. Rehabilitation
11.1.3.1. Market Revenue and Forecast (2017-2030)
Chapter 12. Global U.S. Burn Care Centers Market, Regional Estimates and Trend Forecast
12.1. North America
12.1.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.1.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.1.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.1.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.1.5. U.S.
12.1.5.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.1.5.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.1.5.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.1.5.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.1.6. Rest of North America
12.1.6.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.1.6.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.1.6.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.1.6.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.2. Europe
12.2.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.2.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.2.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.2.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.2.5. UK
12.2.5.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.2.5.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.2.5.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.2.5.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.2.6. Germany
12.2.6.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.2.6.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.2.6.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.2.6.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.2.7. France
12.2.7.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.2.7.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.2.7.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.2.7.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.2.8. Rest of Europe
12.2.8.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.2.8.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.2.8.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.2.8.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.3. APAC
12.3.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.3.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.3.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.3.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.3.5. India
12.3.5.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.3.5.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.3.5.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.3.5.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.3.6. China
12.3.6.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.3.6.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.3.6.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.3.6.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.3.7. Japan
12.3.7.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.3.7.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.3.7.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.3.7.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.3.8. Rest of APAC
12.3.8.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.3.8.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.3.8.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.3.8.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.4. MEA
12.4.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.4.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.4.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.4.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.4.5. GCC
12.4.5.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.4.5.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.4.5.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.4.5.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.4.6. North Africa
12.4.6.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.4.6.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.4.6.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.4.6.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.4.7. South Africa
12.4.7.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.4.7.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.4.7.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.4.7.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.4.8. Rest of MEA
12.4.8.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.4.8.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.4.8.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.4.8.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.5. Latin America
12.5.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.5.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.5.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.5.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.5.5. Brazil
12.5.5.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.5.5.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.5.5.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.5.5.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
12.5.6. Rest of LATAM
12.5.6.1. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Facility Type (2017-2030)
12.5.6.2. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Procedure Type (2017-2030)
12.5.6.3. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Burn Severity (2017-2030)
12.5.6.4. Market Revenue and Forecast, by Service Type (2017-2030)
Chapter 13. Company Profiles
13.1. Saint Francis Memorial Hospital Bothin Burn Center
13.1.1. Company Overview
13.1.2. Product Offerings
13.1.3. Financial Performance
13.1.4. Recent Initiatives
13.2. LAC+USC Medical Burn Center
13.2.1. Company Overview
13.2.2. Product Offerings
13.2.3. Financial Performance
13.2.4. Recent Initiatives
13.3. Weill Cornell Medicine William Randolph Hearst Burn Center
13.3.1. Company Overview
13.3.2. Product Offerings
13.3.3. Financial Performance
13.3.4. Recent Initiatives
13.4. Temple University Hospital Adult Burn Center
13.4.1. Company Overview
13.4.2. Product Offerings
13.4.3. Financial Performance
13.4.4. Recent Initiatives
13.5. Parkland Memorial Hospital Regional Burn Center
13.5.1. Company Overview
13.5.2. Product Offerings
13.5.3. Financial Performance
13.5.4. Recent Initiatives
13.6. MedStar Washington Hospital Center
13.6.1. Company Overview
13.6.2. Product Offerings
13.6.3. Financial Performance
13.6.4. Recent Initiatives
13.7. St. Barnabas Burn Center
13.7.1. Company Overview
13.7.2. Product Offerings
13.7.3. Financial Performance
13.7.4. Recent Initiatives
13.8. UMC Lions Burn Center
13.8.1. Company Overview
13.8.2. Product Offerings
13.8.3. Financial Performance
13.8.4. Recent Initiatives
13.9. University of Chicago Burn Center
13.9.1. Company Overview
13.9.2. Product Offerings
13.9.3. Financial Performance
13.9.4. Recent Initiatives
13.10. Ohio State University Hospital Adult Burn Center
13.10.1. Company Overview
13.10.2. Product Offerings
13.10.3. Financial Performance
13.10.4. Recent Initiatives
Chapter 14. Research Methodology
14.1. Primary Research
14.2. Secondary Research
14.3. Assumptions
Chapter 15. Appendix
15.1. About Us
15.2. Glossary of Terms